D V D . A N D . R U
* Запасной телеграм канал *

[Индекс] [Ответить] [Посмотреть ветку] [Настройки]

Адекватный анализ... (+)
Автор: Viper
Дата: 11.04.17, @23:23

На басурманском.
Много букв.

http://thesaker.is/a-multi-level-analysis-of-the-us-cruise-missile-attack-on-syria-and-its-consequences/

The Russians expressed their total disgust and outrage at this attack and openly began saying that the Americans were “недоговороспособны”. What that word means is literally “not-agreement-capable” or unable to make and then abide by an agreement. While polite, this expression is also extremely strong as it implies not so much a deliberate deception as the lack of the very ability to make a deal and abide by it. For example, the Russians have often said that the Kiev regime is “not-agreement-capable”, and that makes sense considering that the Nazi occupied Ukraine is essentially a failed state. But to say that a nuclear world superpower is “not-agreement-capable” is a terrible and extreme diagnostic. It basically means that the Americans have gone crazy and lost the very ability to make any kind of deal. Again, a government which breaks its promises or tries to deceive but who, at least in theory, remains capable of sticking to an agreement would not be described as “not-agreement-capable”. That expression is only used to describe an entity which does not even have the skillset needed to negotiate and stick to an agreement in its political toolkit. This is an absolutely devastating diagnostic.

Сообщения в ветке

От оно што, Михалыч (+) -- mr.PK -- 11.04.17@14:33 (Чит.: 332)

Адекватный анализ... (+) -- Viper -- 11.04.17@23:23 (Чит.: 248)
Это же долбодятел храмчихин. ;) (+) -- Viper -- 11.04.17@15:31 (Чит.: 285)
RE: Такие ссайты (+) -- Archer -- 11.04.17@14:56 (Чит.: 292)

ну почему же (+) -- mr.PK -- 11.04.17@14:59 (Чит.: 270)

RE: ну почему же (+) -- Fighter125 -- 11.04.17@15:23 (Чит.: 280)

RE: ну почему же (+) -- mr.PK -- 11.04.17@16:11 (Чит.: 240)

RE: ну почему же (+) -- Fighter125 -- 11.04.17@16:14 (Чит.: 212)

ну хорошо, хорошо убедил, наши - пыщ пыщ пыщ ))) (-) -- mr.PK -- 11.04.17@16:17 (Чит.: 177)

я сам в эту версию не верю. но она не "неправдоподобна" ))) (-) -- Fighter125 -- 11.04.17@16:38 (Чит.: 173)

Имхо, если наши и участвовали каким-то боком, то думаю РЭБом. (-) -- Клёпа -- 11.04.17@17:03 (Чит.: 191)

RE: не иначе как Карлсон с сачком шалил! (-) -- qwerty -- 11.04.17@17:14 (Чит.: 182)
вот тут немного написано... -- Andis -- 11.04.17@17:12 (Чит.: 263)
!!! (-) -- mr.PK -- 11.04.17@17:09 (Чит.: 144)

' На басурманском.
' Много букв.
' 
' <a href="http://thesaker.is/a-multi-level-analysis-of-the-us-cruise-missile-attack-on-syria-and-its-consequences/">http://thesaker.is/a-multi-level-analysis-of-the-us-cruise-missile-attack-on-syria-and-its-consequences/</a>
' 
' The Russians expressed their total disgust and outrage at this attack and openly began saying that the Americans were “недоговороспособны”.  What that word means is literally “not-agreement-capable” or unable to make and then abide by an agreement.  While polite, this expression is also extremely strong as it implies not so much a deliberate deception as the lack of the very ability to make a deal and abide by it.  For example, the Russians have often said that the Kiev regime is “not-agreement-capable”, and that makes sense considering that the Nazi occupied Ukraine is essentially a failed state.  But to say that a nuclear world superpower is “not-agreement-capable” is a terrible and extreme diagnostic.  It basically means that the Americans have gone crazy and lost the very ability to make any kind of deal.  Again, a government which breaks its promises or tries to deceive but who, at least in theory, remains capable of sticking to an agreement would not be described as “not-agreement-capable”.  That expression is only used to describe an entity which does not even have the skillset needed to negotiate and stick to an agreement in its political toolkit.  This is an absolutely devastating diagnostic.

Посылать уведомление об ответе:

[Индекс] [Ответить] [Посмотреть ветку] [Настройки]